In a lawsuit about damages from excavation work, which statement about the owner's liability is true?

In the context of construction and excavation work, the principle of liability indicates that the owner of a property can be held responsible for damages resulting from the activities conducted on their property. This holds especially true when it comes to excavation work, which can pose inherent risks to neighboring properties and individuals.

The rationale behind the owner's liability stems from the legal concept of "vicarious liability," which suggests that an owner may be held accountable for the actions of the contractors they hire. While hiring a contractor with expertise or ensuring that the work is reasonable could mitigate some liability, it does not necessarily absolve the owner from all responsibility in the event that the contractor's actions lead to injuries or damages.

Moreover, the nature of excavation work is such that it inherently carries risks that can result in accidents or structural damage nearby. Therefore, even if a contractor is experienced and qualified, the owner still maintains a level of legal responsibility for the safety and legality of the work being performed on their property.

This liability is particularly relevant in the case where injuries or damage occur. It serves to emphasize the owner's duty to ensure not just that the work is performed competently but also safely, aligning with community and legal standards. Thus, the statement about the owner's perpetual liability for damages resulting from