Which statement reflects the shared liability of occupiers and independent contractors?

The selected answer is accurate because it highlights the principle of shared liability in scenarios involving inherently dangerous work. When an independent contractor is hired to perform work that is inherently hazardous, both the occupier of the premises and the contractor can be held liable for damages resulting from that work due to their respective roles and the nature of the task.

Occupiers have a responsibility to ensure that their premises are safe, while independent contractors are responsible for the safe execution of their work. When the work is inherently dangerous, the occupier cannot absolve themselves of all responsibility simply by hiring a contractor, as their duty to provide a safe environment continues.

This shared liability emphasizes the importance of both parties taking appropriate precautions and adhering to safety standards, as both can face legal consequences if an injury occurs as a result of the dangerous work and negligence is proven against either party. This reinforces the understanding that the presence of independent contractors does not eliminate an occupier's liability in situations where risks are present.

Other options present misunderstandings of liability nuances. Assuming that both parties are equally liable for all damages does not account for the differing levels of responsibility based on circumstances. Indicating that liability is void if a contractor is hired inaccurately suggests that an occupier can escape responsibility entirely under those